<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>i luv cinema&#187; Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iluvcinema.com/category/articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iluvcinema.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Weekend Full of Guilty Pleasures</title>
		<link>http://iluvcinema.com/2011/10/a-weekend-full-of-guilty-pleasures/</link>
		<comments>http://iluvcinema.com/2011/10/a-weekend-full-of-guilty-pleasures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iluvcinema</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guilty pleasure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iluvcinema.com/?p=2154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all have them &#8230; guilty pleasure films that no matter what the day or time, we are enthralled by. They are films that when you mention the visceral thrill you derive from them &#8211; people gaze at you in utter surprise (How could you like THAT movie?). Admittedly I do not think that these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all have them &#8230; guilty pleasure films that no matter what the day or time, we are enthralled by. They are films that when you mention the visceral thrill you derive from them &#8211; people gaze at you in utter surprise (<em>How could you like THAT movie?</em>). Admittedly I do not think that these films are that bad; I suppose they just did not do enough to capture a widespread audience. This is fair enough – but in the end what I like about films that fit into this category for me is that they are merely asking you to &#8220;just go with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>This weekend, I had the good fortune to feast on two of my favorites, both from 2003: <em>SWAT </em>and <em>Down with Love</em>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>SWAT (2003)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/S_w_a_t_ver6.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2155 alignright" style="margin: 8px;" title="S_w_a_t_ver6" src="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/S_w_a_t_ver6-201x300.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="190" /></a>Based on the television show of the same name, this film does play like a pretty long episode; at least in the second part. The first part of the film is basically a series of introductions to the chief protagonist/antagonist (Colin Farrel and Jeremy Renner). After this setup we are dropped into a somewhat ludicrous premise &#8211; our rag-tag SWAT team (headed my Samuel L Jackson) are given the mission transferring a billionaire, international super-criminal (Olivier Martinez) for extradition. Thanks to his public declaration of a reward of 100 MILLION DOLLARS to anyone who helps him break free, we are entertained to a host of comic criminal-types who use all sorts of armament trying to set him . I mean the action is OTT. But that is what makes this film enjoyable. There is also the occasional sharp, witty dialogue exchange between the actors.</p>
<p>But like I previously stated, the real star is the adrenaline/testosterone overload produced from the loud crashes booms and explosions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Down With Love (2003)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/220px-Down_with_Love.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2156" style="margin: 8px;" title="220px-Down_with_Love" src="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/220px-Down_with_Love-203x300.jpg" alt="" width="113" height="167" /></a>This is obviously a throwback to those light (and sometimes musical) &#8220;battle of the sexes&#8221; comedies of the late 1950&#8242;s and 1960&#8242;s which often featured Doris Day, Rock Hudson and Tony Randall.  Although because the action is played for a modern audience the double entendre and innuendo are a bit more blatant.</p>
<p>In the leads we have Renée Zellwegger and Ewan McGergor with a supporting cast which includes David Hyde Pierce, Sarah Paulson and &#8230; Tony Randall!</p>
<p>The plot includes a smorgasbord of this sub-genre conventions, including switched identities and reversal of traditional gender roles. The hyper-stylized sets and costumes perfectly match films of the era and is another reason to sit back with your popcorn (or chocolate) and just enjoy!</p>
<p><em>What are some of your favorite &#8220;guilty pleasures&#8221;</em>?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iluvcinema.com/2011/10/a-weekend-full-of-guilty-pleasures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Politics and Business of Oscar Campaigning</title>
		<link>http://iluvcinema.com/2009/12/the-politics-and-business-of-oscar-campaigning/</link>
		<comments>http://iluvcinema.com/2009/12/the-politics-and-business-of-oscar-campaigning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar campaigning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iluvcinema.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article in the NY Times &#8230;. http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/the-politics-of-oscar-campaigning/ What do you all think? Here is a book which also elaborates on the thesis of the above-mentioned article, All About Oscar: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article in the NY Times &#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/the-politics-of-oscar-campaigning/">http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/the-politics-of-oscar-campaigning/</a></p>
<p>What do you all think?</p>
<p>Here is a book which also elaborates on the thesis of the above-mentioned article,<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0826415555?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=iluvcinema-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0826415555"> All About Oscar: The History and Politics of the Academy Awards</a><img style="border: medium none!important; margin: 0!important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=iluvcinema-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0826415555" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iluvcinema.com/2009/12/the-politics-and-business-of-oscar-campaigning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Further Evidence of the Power of Kate</title>
		<link>http://iluvcinema.com/2009/11/further-evidence-of-the-power-of-kate/</link>
		<comments>http://iluvcinema.com/2009/11/further-evidence-of-the-power-of-kate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british film industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iluvcinema.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[newspaper article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/07gold190.1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1373" title="07gold190.1" src="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/07gold190.1.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="260" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/07gold190.1.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/nov/09/kate-winslet-british-economy" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-521 aligncenter" style="border: 0 none;" title="guardian_logo" src="http://iluvcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/guardian_logo.gif" alt="guardian_logo" width="140" height="22" />newspaper article</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iluvcinema.com/2009/11/further-evidence-of-the-power-of-kate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

