Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: An Affair of Love (1999/2000)

An Affair of Love* is a French language film from 1999 (distributed in the US in 2000) directed by Belgian Frédéric Fonteyne and starring Nathalie Baye and Sergi Lopez in the title roles of ‘Her’ and ‘Him’.

‘Her’ and ‘Him’ meet via a personal ad in a magazine.They are both seeking an anonymous liaison; they do not know each other’s name (as has been agreed upon). However, over the course of the affair, it becomes obvious to the couple as well to the audience that what was supposed to be a series of ‘encounters’ has become something a bit more complicated. The question then becomes what will happen next?

I will not completely ‘spoil’ the rest of the plot in hopes that you will check out this film; but I suspect that many of you will be able to figure it out to varying degrees.

The irony of the French title is that there is nothing pornographic about this film. In fact, quite the opposite is true: it is a tender tale of two people who are faced with the decision as whether or not to act upon their love for each other.

I like to think of this film as sort of a companion piece to another tale of love that is (maybe) not fully realized – Noel Coward’s Brief Encounter. In Brief Encounter, we have a pair of adults whose love is present but never fully expressed (their one attempt falls haplessly apart). In An Affair of Love there is the full expression of the act of love which develops into a real love – but it is similar to Brief Encounter in that the love is somehow incomplete and not fully realized to a conventional satisfaction.

In both movies, the end result can (may) leave the audience feeling alienated and unfulfilled. But because An Affair of Love is handled properly – through its adept directing and acting – the audience leaves the film understanding. In my opinion, there must be a level of accomplishment in having achieved that.


* French Title: Une Liaison Pornographique

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Hot Fuzz (2007)

Fans of Edgar Wright will recognize his name from works such as:

  • Shaun of the Dead
  • Scott Pilgrim vs. The World
  • and the television series, Spaced.

Here he is with frequent collaborators Simon Pegg and Nick Frost for the 2007 black comedy Hot Fuzz. It is essentially a send-up of the buddy cop genre.

Nicholas Angel (Pegg) is a police officer with the Metropolitan Police of London. He is a “super-cop,” which oddly enough does not sit well with his supervisors (there is such a thing as being TOO good).  As a result, he is sent off to the sleepy English village of Sanford, where it is supposed that he will not have to worry about any criminal activity. In Sanford he is partnered with Danny Butterman (Nick Frost) who is in awe of his new partner’s big city prowess. The other members of the Sanford Police force (headed by Jim Broadbent as Frank Butterman, Danny’s father) are not as impressed by the big-city import.

The rest of Sanford’s citizenry welcome Nicholas with varying degrees of acceptance. The town’s characters are an interesting lot to say the least. Of particular significance especially at the beginning of Nicholas’ investigations is Simon Skinner (the wonderful Timothy Dalton) manager of a local grocery store.

All is quite until a series of suspicious deaths draw the attention of Angel.  He soon discovers that while the crime rate (and murders) are nil, Sanford has a high number of deaths by accident or suicide in its records. After some snooping around he discovers an appalling secret about “The Village of the Year.”

As a measure of how much I liked this film, I cannot tell you how many times I have watched it and continuously laughed at what I saw. The surprise cameos (see how many you can count) are well worth the price of admission.

For the uninitiated, one thing that I bring to a potential viewer’s attention is the fact that there is a great deal of bloody violence in the film despite its overall comedic tone.

Personally this was my first complete entree into world of Edgar Wright. Since then I have watched bits of “Spaced” and not all of Shaun of the Dead. On the strength of this outing I plan on completing the above and to sink my teeth into Scott Pilgrim vs The World.

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: from the iluvcinema “Vault”

This week I decided to do a little something different for my “overlooked entry.” Over the past few years, I have made it a goal of mine with this site, to talk about or highlight films that I love and that I feel are somewhat under-appreciated. This obviously fits in with the whole overlooked aspect of this Tuesday feature.

As a result, this week I have decided to go into my own archives and dig pick a few films that I have mentioned in the past that I would like to mention again.

Fish Tank (2010): directed by Andrea Arnold (Red Road, forthcoming Wuthering Heights adaptation) and starring recent Venice Film Festival winner Michael Fassbender.
Heavenly Creatures (1994): featuring the ever-awesome Kate Winslet in her feature film debut.
Shooting Dogs [AKA Beyond the Gates (2007)]: Came out around the same time as Hotel Rwandaa, therefore little seen. Which is a shame – it is still a moving heartbreaking story. Directed by Michael Caton Jones
Children of Men (2006): Easily one of my favorite films of the last 5, heck 10 years.
Never Let Me Go (2010/2011): Another one of those films that came in under the radar last year/this year. It is now on rotation on pay cable. Catch it if you can.
Appaloosa (2010): Delivers what is advertised on the tin; simply a nuts and bolts western.
My Last Five Girlfriends (2009): A very imaginative take on a man’s journey through the relationship maze.
Muriel’s Wedding (1994): The linked post was not directly related to Muriel’s Wedding but it does mention it. This is another one of those films I could watch over and over again.
Wait Until Dark (1967): A surprisingly thrilling film. Featuring Audrey Hepburn and Alan Arkin.
The Snake Pit (1948): Possibly Olivia deHaviland’s best work

 

For more overlooked films as well as reading an insightful blog in general, be sure to visit Todd Mason’s blog, Sweet Freedom.

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Home of the Brave (1949)

This week’s selection may  come across as a bit dated especially by today’s standards, but in 1949 it was somewhat ahead of its time. It is the Stanley Kramer-produced Home of the Brave.

Stanley Kramer was know as “Hollywood’s Conscious” in that he either directed or produced films that brought awareness to some social ill, injustice or championed the plight of society’s “underdogs.” If you are familiar with any of the films, you will know that even at the time of their release, they created strong reactions – and not always in the way that Kramer anticipated.

His film credits include:

[As a director]

  • Not as a Stranger (1955)
  • The Pride and the Passion (1957)
  • The Defiant Ones (1958)
  • On the Beach (1959)
  • Inherit the Wind (1960)
  • Judgment at Nuremberg (1961)
  • It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963)
  • Ship of Fools (1965)
  • Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967)
  • The Secret of Santa Vittoria (1968)
  • R. P. M. (1970)
  • Bless the Beasts and Children (1971)
  • Oklahoma Crude (1973)
  • The Domino Principle (1977)
  • The Runner Stumbles (1979)

[As a producer]

  • Champion (1949)
  • Home of the Brave (1949)
  • The Men (1950)
  • Cyrano de Bergerac (1950)
  • Death of a Salesman (1951)
  • High Noon (1952)
  • The Sniper (1952)
  • The Member of the Wedding (1952)
  • The Wild One (1953)
  • The Juggler (1953)
  • The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T (1953)
  • The Caine Mutiny (1954)
  • Pressure Point (1962)
  • A Child is Waiting (1963)
  • It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963)

In the case of Home of the Brave, the problem addressed is that of racism in the face of the horrors of war; this is a slight deviation from the original play’s addressing the issue of Antisemitism.

The plot deals with a black WWII veteran, Pvt Peter Moss (James Edwards) who has been paralyzed in combat. As part of his treatment, he is undergoing psychoanalysis. Via flashback, we see that he is wracked with guilt a the loss of a lifelong buddy (portrayed by Lloyd Bridges). This overhwleming guilt is compounded by the racism he encounters while on duty. These factors play a major role in his lack of progress in recovery.

The film’s goal is to probe these issues to the point where we (hopefully) see Moss overcome and prevail.

I recommend this picture mainly out of reminiscence of watching this with my late father; he had the knack pulling up a rare movie of this bygone era of cinema.

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Wallace & Gromit – The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)

This week’s movie is a slightly tricky one for me. Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit is an Academy Award winner, when upon its release, was number 1 in the US Box and maintained a worldwide number 1 for a few weeks after its release. So that begs the question – how could it be considered overlooked? Here is one reason:

  • As an adult, I rarely watch animated features. And I am certain that there are others out there like me. This is one film that I think appeals to kids and adults alike but not in that overtly post-modern way that many of the recent spate of animated features is designed. So despite its relative commercial and critical success, it is safe to say that there is a nice slice of the movie-going public that have not had the pleasure of seeing this film.

I have been vaguely aware of the adventures of Wallace & Gromit, but my general impression is that W&G were not widely popular in America.

You do not have to be a fan of the series to get into the plot, but it might help to know a little background about Wallace and Gromit. In Curse of the Were-Rabbit, Wallace (voiced by Peter Sallis) is running a company called Anti-Pesto, which specializes in humane pest control. The annual vegetable competition at Tottington Hall is around the corner and the townspeople want to protect their veg from all forms of pest. Wallace soon gets a call from Lady Tottington (voice of Helena Bonham Carter) to handle her rabbit infestation problem. Wallace then gets the idea to use one of his “inventions.” The use of his Mind Manipulation-O-Matic appears to have been success; however, there is a “malfunction” that has rather disastrous consequences.

Also adding to Wallace’s problems is competition for the affections Lady Tottington in the form of Lord Quartermaine (voiced by Ralph Fiennes).

This film was part of a 5-picture deal with Aardman Studios signed with DreamWorks studio (included the 2000 Chicken Run and the 2006 digital animation Flushed Away). I have also heard anecdotes and read that DreamWorks was trying to pressure Nick Park and Steve Box to make some changes — to which they did not succumb. Due in part to the “modest” success of this film in the domestic box office and the aforementioned creative differences between the studio and the filmmakers, the partnership ended in 2007.

I found this to be a very entertaining in spite of my general reservations to full length animated features.

Incidentally, I would also recommend the following Wallace & Gromit adventures:

If you have seen it let me know what you think.

 

Sources: Wikipedia, Aardman Production website

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Midnight Lace (1960)

This week’s contribution to Sweet Freedom’s Overlooked Films is in honor of 87-year Doris Day releasing a new album, I have decided to choose one of my favorite films featuring her – Midnight Lace. I previously listed this film as one of my favorite films set in London.

One reason why I like this film (and her in it) is that it is a departure into the realm of drama for her. For many audiences the mere mention of the name Doris Day conjures up images of a bubbly perky miss singing along and romancing Rock Hudson. But here in Midnight, she attempts to break that typecast. The result — the “All American Girl” goes abroad.

Midnight Lace‘s plot is pretty formulaic, with shades of Hitchcock, Gaslight and several other derivatives, but that does not make it any less entertaining. Kit Preston (Day) is a newly married woman living in London with her husband Tony (Rex Harrison). One of the early scenes tells us that all is not going well for Kit – in the midst of the London fog, a frightening voice calls out to her … with threats of her demise. Distraught, she goes to Tony, who attempts to reassure her that she should dismiss this encounter and “just relax.”

As you can imagine more strange “happenings” occur with an increasing level of frequency and menace, which is matched with Kit’s increasing paranoia. Throw into this scenario the appearance of a handsome stranger (a pretty wooden John Gavin – probably the one element I could do without) and nosy Aunt Bea (Myrna Loy, another personal favorite) and you have all the elements of a story that courses through several twists and turns with an ultimate payoff that may surprise many. For others, it may be a bit predictable, but I still think that is a film that if you have not seen, it is worth giving it a try.

Abridged Credits:
Director: David Miller
Screenplay: Ivan Goff, Ben Roberts, Janet Green (play)
Principle Cast: Doris Day (Kit Preston), Rex Harrison (Tony Preston), John Gavin (Brian Younger), Myrna Loy (Aunt Bea), Roddy McDowall (Malcolm), Herbert Marshall (Charles Manning).
Runtime: 109 minutes

———-
Sources: Wikipedia, tcm.com

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Conversations with Other Women (2005)

For this week’s selection I am moving a little forward in time – to 2005. This is a selection that may not go over well with many of my readers, but it is a film that in spite of itself I enjoyed.

Conversations with Other Women is a film which focuses on a meeting at a wedding between two people, portrayed by Helena Bonham Carter and Aaron Eckhart respectively. The conversation eventually leads up to Ms. Carter’s hotel room where all is revealed over the film’s 84-munite run time. In a series of flashbacks, we discover that there is more to this meeting than pure chance.

This is a very talkie “independently-spirited” movie that is to be sure. But like I said in the introduction, in spite of this cliche, I really did enjoy it. The principle reason for my enjoyment has to be the central performances. For most audiences Helena Bonham Carter is known to play “mad as a hatter” type roles. But here she proves to the audience that she is most assuredly an actor of great depth and nuance. Never that I was in doubt :) I know that some people are not too wild about Aaron Eckhart but I like him here. In fact I like him in general.

Equally worth noting is that this film is Hank Canosa’s feature film debut. And with a budget of 450,000 USD, we are getting every penny’s worth.

 

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Night Train to Munich (1940)

Night Train to Munich deftly blends romance, comedy and suspense to create a great piece of entertainment. Much credit to this must go to director Carol Reed (of The Third Man notorietyfor his ability to combine all of these elements together.

The plot is somewhat generic for WWII espionage thrillers of the period with a few added twists and turns for good measure:

A Czech scientist has some information the Nazis want. As he and his daughter attempt to flee the impending occupation, the daughter (portrayed by Margaret Lockwood) is apprehended and sent to a concentration camp. She eventually “escapes” and heads to England to find her father, who is hidden somewhere in the country. While there, she comes in contact with British intelligence primarily in the form of Rex Harrison. All of this sets the narrative in motion in a race against time to prevent the Nazis from getting their hands on the Czech scientist’s secret.

As previously stated, the plot is somewhat generic for a wartime espionage thriller. Taken in its proper context, this makes sense. The year is 1940 and the film represents a propaganda-styled film designed to boost the morale of a nation deeply in the throws of a war against Germany; at this time England literally must feel like an island unto its own as it is about a year before the United States officially enters the conflict.

According to my research, Carol Reed looked at this film as a “sequel” of sorts to Alfred Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes, made two years earlier. While Night Train to Munich shares many similarities to its predecessor, chiefly (1) a main part of the action takes place on a train; (2) the cast includes Margaret Lockwood and the popular Charters and Caldicott (portrayed by Basil Radford and Naunton Wayne, respectively); (3) it features a death-defying climatic sequence of events.

But that is where the similarities end. Notable and welcomed additions to this idea are the presence of Rex Harrison and Paul Henreid. In the case of the latter, Henreid puts on display his fine acting ability and succeeds in convincing the audience that he is a bona-fide “baddie.” This portrayal is in stark contrast to his later heroic turns in both Casablanca and Now, Voyager (both from 1942).

Night Train to Munich takes its audience on a fun and thrilling ride from the Czech Republic to England and Germany.

While you may occasionally catch it on cable (I recently watched it on Turner Classic Movies), it is also available on Criterion DVD at several online retail outlets.

 

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Liberty Heights (1999)

Let it be known: I love coming of age stories. Yes they can be rather saccharine and mind-numbingly formulaic at times, but for me that is sometimes the appeal of the pictures. We are all guilty of looking at our youth from a romanticized perspective, although we will swear up and down that our recollection of these events are exactly as we say they are.

My selection from this week’s overlooked film – Liberty Heights (1999) tends to tell its story a little bit straighter but that does not make it any less enjoyable. In fact, that is one of the appealing aspects of the film for me, especially since it is not a period in I know about first-hand.

What I find so fascinating about this period of time in America is mainly what I have learned from history. Underneath the surface of suburban tranquility, there lied an undercurrent of an impending social and cultural upheaval. So it is interesting in looking back at a time that is not part of my life experience through the eyes of someone who lived it.

The eyes with which we view this world through are those of Barry Levinson, director of The Natural, Rain Man, and Good Morning Vietnam to name a few. In Liberty Heights,  Levinson manages to strike a balance between presenting his tale to a knowing audience while also showing the world his characters inhabit as they lived it. Put another way, what often happens with period pieces is that there is some revisionism in how much the characters are self-aware that they are a part of something greater. Of course in reality, we don’t live our lives in that greater context; most of us go about our lives just trying to make the best out of what is laid out before us.

The plot: the story is a semi-autobiographical tale of Levinson’s experiences growing up in a Jewish suburban neighborhood in Baltimore, circa 1954. We are drawn into the parallel stories of Van and Ben Kurtzman (portrayed by Adrien Brody and Ben Foster respectively). Van is in college and Ben (our primary protagonist) is a high school student.

Ben’s school has recently been integrated and he quickly finds himself intrigued (and attracted) to a new African American female in his class. You probably know where this story goes from there … Meanwhile, Van has an encounter with a mysterious blonde who he instantly falls for.

There is also a subplot that deals with the Kurtzman patriarch (Joe Mantegna) and his less-than-above-the-board dealings. This storyline in particular did not interest me as much, but its presence is a part of the plot development.

This film plays on two levels – the racial politics surrounding desegregation as well as the class politics of Van’s burgeoning relationship with an “All-American” girl. But like I previously stated, what makes this story watchable is that in spite of our “knowing” the context in which all the action is taking place, the characters are not absolutely operating in the know (if you catch my meaning).

While there are a couple of things about the film that left me a bit ambivalent, on balance, I enjoyed watching it.  In other words, a minor Barry Levinson film is better than some of the best offerings of other directors out there.

Oh yeah and the soundtrack is pretty good too (if you like 1950′s rock ‘n roll).

 

Tuesday’s Overlooked Film: Caged

This week’s pick is the 1950 “women-in-prison” drama Caged. The film stars Eleanor Parker and was directed by John Cromwell. Screen writing credits are attributed to Virginia Kellogg based on the story Women Without Men written by Kellogg and Bernard C. Schoenfeld (source: Wikipedia).

Many of my “younger” readers may know her as the almost stepmother of the vonTrapp children in The Sound of Music. This role is definitely a great departure from that more glamorous role and we see our protagonist transform from an innocent who falls on hard times, to a prison-hardened dame who is destined for a life of crime.

How does it all go wrong?

19-year old Marie (Parker) takes part in an attempted robbery with her husband. Unfortunately, their plans are thwarted and her husband is killed. It is then off to prison for Marie who soon finds out that she is pregnant. She is determined to keep the child but circumstances arise to make this impossible. As a result she is faced with no choice but to give her child up for adoption.

This event combined with the harsh and brutal treatment she receives at the hands of inmates and guards, transforms Marie into a woman who is destined to be on the wrong side of the law. At the conclusion of the film, she is seen leaving with some “hoods”: her desire to get out of jail has lead to her make a Faustian deal with some less than above board people. The result is an indebtedness that she will have to pay while she is on the “outside.”

For her performance, Eleanor Parker received well-deserved recognition in the form of an Academy Award nomination for Best Actress. There was also a Supporting Actress nod for Hope Emerson as the sadistic prison guard.

What resonated with me about this film is that for its time, it must have been a somewhat shocking look inside a woman’s prison. Some of the goings-on are obviously played up for dramatic reasons, but it still works on many levels.