Today marks the 200th anniversary of one of the English language’s great scribes – Charles Dickens.
I have previously written a post about the Magic of Dickens in which I describe how the medium of television has been so successful at adapting his long, fully formed stories.
Most recently during the month-long December 2011 tribute to Dickens that ran on TCM during the month of December, I ended up watching the ambitious 360-minute, two-part version of Little Dorrit written and directed by Christine Edzard. Who would have imagined that the same story told twice (from different perspectives) could be so entertaining?
Another film I caught over that month was the Hollywood version of Dickens’ unfinished novel, The Mystery of Edwin Drood, starring Claude Rains. Unfortunately, opinion on this film is not fully formed yet as I was watching it having been slightly distracted from giving my undivided attention to the film – so goes the pitfalls of home viewing.
If you are wholly unfamiliar with how the works of someone born 200 years ago have a bearing on shaping our modern cultural landscape, I have compiled a few articles from around the web which point to this idea:
- British Film Institute (BFI), Dickens on Film
- Kansas City Star, Dickens’ Relevance in the land of contemporary film and television.
- Christian Science Monitor, Charles Dickens: 12 great movie and TV adaptations
Are you a fan of the writings / big and small screen adaptations of Charles Dickens? If so which are your favorite?
(Image Credit: TCM.com)
P.S. One more Dickens/movie tie-in: his great-great-great grandson, Harry Lloyd, is an actor in his own right, having featured in films such as Jane Eyre and The Iron Lady.
He has even appeared in screen versions of two of his 3x great-grandfather’s novels: once as the Young Steerforth in David Copperfield and as Herbert Pocket in Great Expectations (source: Internet Movie Database).
The Magic of Charles Dickens
They are the stories of secrets, the distinction (and frivolity) of class in 19th century England. I speak of course of Little Dorrit and Bleak House. The latter I am only now seeing for the first time in its entirety.
For some reason these works are best when they are delivered over a long running time and have as close to the exacting details of their source material. This runs counter to my usual theory that the problem with too many films nowadays is that they unnecessarily drag out the story to fill a 90 minute to two hour running time. I make an exception in the case of Charles Dickens.
His stories deserve the treatment that only television and especially public television can allow. There are so many plots and subplots in his story that are integral to the final plot movements that any major omission would be catastrophic. I am glad that they are this long. Sure it takes forever for them to watch, but at the end they are well worth the wait.
I have seen a couple of big screen adaptations (not all) of his work and they have left me a little less than satisfied. With the outstanding noted exception of 1951′s Scrooge (A Christmas Carol) starring Alistair Simm. I think the reason this works in a 90 minute film is because the source material was not a novel but rather a novellette so instead of having to be compressed for time you have just the right amount of time to tell a story.
For more on the life and times of Charles Dickens, I highly recommend this program which also aired on PBS.