i luv cinema

  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • TCMFF 2019
    • TCMFF 2019: Reflections on a Favorite Film Festival
  • Tribeca 2019
    • When Your Time is Short, Go See a Short! (Tribeca 2019)
    • LINDA RONSTADT: The Sound of My Voice
  • London Film Festival 2019
    • BFI London Film Festival 2019 – My 1st Time!
    • The Aeronauts (2019) was Fun (Kinda)
    • Knives Out: A Highlight on My Cinematic Calendar
    • A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: A Review
    • Ford v Ferrari (Le Mans ’66)
  • 100 “Must-See”
  • About Me
Home Classics A Tale of Two Silents

May 20, 2012 By iluvcinema 9 Comments

A Tale of Two Silents

This past week was a bit of a triumph for me. I finally caught up with a couple of classic silent films I was told are “must see.” My reaction to each piece was a personal revelation.

Let’s start with City Lights, the 1931 silent feature written, directed and starring one Charlie Chaplin.

At the time of the film’s release, silent pictures were on the wane, ushered in by 1929’s The Jazz Singer. So you can imagine how worried Chaplin was about the reception this film would receive in the public. Chaplin need not have worried.

The story of “The Tramp” and his love for the blind Flower Girl (Virginia Cherrill) was equally parts funny and enchanting. In other words, I absolutely loved it. There is something about the coordination of the physical, narrative and musical performance that pulls you in and does not let go.

Even if you are not a fan of silent film, I can guarantee that this is a great entrée into the genre.

 

Metropolis

The story of the multiple restoration efforts has become something of legend. I feel as if that these stories only added to the idea of Fritz Lang’s sci-fi extravaganza as a “lost masterpiece.” As a result, Metropolis has been on my must-watch list and now, I was going to witness the mastery first-hand.

Click here for Metropolis synopsis (source: IMDb)

 

Well, while there is no doubt that the film is visually arresting in scale, scope and ambition (there was nothing like it at the time), I found the narrative quite wanting and middling in places. This definitely was not the futuristic dystopia I was hoped to see. But I was determined – I kept on watching, hoping at once to have that “eureka” moment, where I understand what the fuss was all about. Unfortunately that moment never came for me.

Let me clarify: the film is not bad, but rather I did not respond to it in the way I really wanted to. This somewhat (but not intentional) contrarian view on Metropolis left me wondering … did anyone have the same reaction after seeing it?

Share this:

  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Print
  • Tumblr

Filed Under: Classics

Comments

  1. Sergio (Tipping My Fedora) says

    May 21, 2012 at 3:28 pm

    What a contrasting pair Iba! I’ve seen both several times at the cinema over the decades and, like most silent movies, they benefit enormously from the level of audience participation that the silent style engenders (and demands). CITY LIGHTS, made four years after THE JAZZ SINGER was a sort of valentine to the simplicity of movie pantomime and is a truly beguiling mixture of laughs and pathos. METROPOLIS is a strange mixture of biblical parable, gentle fantasy and hardcore science fiction – it is in many a truly incoherent work (I have a good friend who likes nothing better in times of stress to mime Freder’s mad attempts to keep time through vigorous arm gestures! It’s a peculiar melange and shouldn’t work though I think the restored version does largely make sense of the plot and on its own terms is a real masterpiece even if at various points it does seem to change from one kind of film into another. As a sort Expressionistic fantasy on the perils of mechanisation and modernity it is certainly hard to beat! I’ve always had a soft spot for the version scored by Giorgio Moroder, which is now available on DVD too.
    Sergio (Tipping My Fedora) recently posted..A is for … AmnesiaMy Profile

    Reply
    • iluvcinema says

      May 21, 2012 at 3:35 pm

      Well your knowledge base is far superior on Metropolis than mine, so I will take your word for it.

      I think my issue with the film has to do exactly with what you are describing so eloquently. In other words, all of the stories I have heard about ‘missing footage,’ scoring and this being a complete film, etc. really, I mean REALLY built up my own personal expectations for the film. In the end, I felt let down by my own hopes for the film. Not for nothing the scale of the film especially for the time is noteworthy in its own right.

      My next silent is likely to be Murnau’s “Sunrise”.

      Reply
      • Sergio (Tipping My Fedora) says

        May 22, 2012 at 8:37 am

        SUNRISE is of course a beautiful, poetic masterpiece that is much more of a piece – erally look forward to reading what you have to say on it.
        Sergio (Tipping My Fedora) recently posted..Town on Trial (1957) – Tuesday’s Forgotten FilmMy Profile

        Reply
        • iluvcinema says

          May 22, 2012 at 10:35 am

          I can’t wait to see it 🙂

  2. Eric says

    May 23, 2012 at 1:13 am

    Glad to hear you really enjoyed City Lights. I saw that for the first time last year and fell in love with it.

    Metropolis is part of my current movie project so I plan on catching it soon. It will be interesting to see how our thoughts compare.
    Eric recently posted..Movie Project #18: Rocky [1976]My Profile

    Reply
    • iluvcinema says

      May 23, 2012 at 1:24 am

      I look forward to getting your take on Metropolis.

      Reply
  3. Tom Gooderson-A'Court says

    September 5, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    I agree with you about Metropolis. Visualy it’s stunning but the plot is a little too messy.

    As for City Lights, I think it is my favourite Chaplin film. It wonderfully mixes his best romantic plot with some of his best comedic moments.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Readers’ Choice: le0pard13 Asks … — i luv cinema says:
    April 2, 2014 at 10:16 am

    […] I did not hate it either. Overall, I was very ambivalent about the experience, as I expressed in my May 2012 piece on the very subject of silent films. Since then, the needle on that position has not really […]

    Reply
  2. Ex Machina (2015): Build it at Your Own Risk says:
    May 27, 2015 at 10:00 am

    […] (Alicia Vikander, who reminds me of an updated version of Maschinenmensch from Fritz Lang’s Metropolis). The objective is simple – to see if Ava can pass the Turig Test, in which the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badgeShow more posts

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Read

contender

Added to My Video Library

the blob

Subscribe to iluvcinema

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts.

Centers of Film Study

  • JBFC
  • MoMA Film Screenings
  • The Picture House
  • University of California Press (Cinema and Media Texts)

Fast Film Resources

  • Alfred Hitchcock Wiki
  • Alfred Hitchcock-Master of Suspense
  • Film | The Guardian
  • Kermode & Mayo's Film Reviews
  • Park Circus
  • Rotten Tomatoes
  • The Internet Movie Database
  • Tribeca Film

Film Societies

  • BAMcinématek
  • Film Society of Lincoln Center

This is How We Blogroll

  • BBC Film: The Bulletin
  • Cinematic Corner
  • Comet Over Hollywood
  • Critical Women on Film
  • FlixChatter
  • Future of Flim (Tribeca Film Blog)
  • in so many words …
  • Kermode's Film Blog
  • Paula's Cinema Club
  • Roger Ebert
  • Sobriety Test Movie Reviews
  • Superhero Movie Talk
  • Sweet Freedom

Archives

Tweets by @iluvcinema
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact iluvcinema
totalfilm600movieblogs

Copyright © 2021, iluvcinema ·Streamline Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.